Virtual Mentor. January 2005, Volume 7, Number 1.
Case 5.2: Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia—Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future
The physician's role is healing disease, preserving life, and relieving suffering. In end-of-life care, the duties to relieve suffering and preserve life can come into conflict. Although as much as possible should be done to relieve suffering, the physician's duty to preserve life is overriding. Even though physician-assisted suicide is now legal in Oregon, it remains the position of the AMA that physician-assisted suicide violates the traditional prohibition against using the tools of medicine to cause a patient's death. Physician-assisted suicide also carries societal risks, including the potential for coercive pressures on patients to choose suicide.
While in some difficult cases physician-assisted suicide may seem appropriate, the medical profession does not condone the practice due to the likelihood of grave harm. Physicians instead must strive to identify the concerns behind patients' requests for assisted suicide, and make concerted efforts at finding ways to address these concerns short of assisting suicide, including providing more aggressive comfort care. At the present, many physicians are not adequately informed about the modalities of pain control for patients with severe chronic pain. The success of the hospice movement illustrates the extent to which aggressive pain control and close attention to patient comfort and dignity can ease the transition to death.
The people and events in this case are fictional. Resemblance to real events or to names of people, living or dead, is entirely coincidental. The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the AMA.
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.