Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Health Law Nov 2021 Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned? Jake Greenblum, PhD and Ryan Hubbard, PhD Overturning this case’s precedent might result in clinicians claiming more religious exemptions and increased risk of harm to patients. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(11):E864-868. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.864. Podcast Nov 2021 Author Interview: “Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?” Dr Jake Greenblum joins Ethics Talk to discuss his article, coauthored with Dr Ryan Hubbard: “Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?” Health Law Mar 2020 Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians’ Conscience-Based Refusals? Rachel Kogan, JD, Katherine L. Kraschel, JD, and Claudia E. Haupt, PhD, JSD When a clinician refuses to do a procedure consistent with standard of care for a patient, legal resources can be helpful. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E209-216. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209. Medicine and Society Mar 2020 How Should We Judge Whether and When Mission Statements Are Ethically Deployed? Kellie E. Schueler and Debra B. Stulberg, MD Mission statements offer limited benefit when patients do not have meaningful choices about where to seek care and can be misused. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E239-247. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.239. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 1 Patrick D. Guinan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 2 Malika Haque, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 The Evangelizing Patient, Commentary 1 J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):359-366. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas4-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 The Evangelizing Patient, Commentary 2 John Dunlop, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):359-366. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas4-0505. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Next page Next › Last page Last »
Health Law Nov 2021 Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned? Jake Greenblum, PhD and Ryan Hubbard, PhD Overturning this case’s precedent might result in clinicians claiming more religious exemptions and increased risk of harm to patients. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(11):E864-868. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.864.
Podcast Nov 2021 Author Interview: “Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?” Dr Jake Greenblum joins Ethics Talk to discuss his article, coauthored with Dr Ryan Hubbard: “Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?”
Health Law Mar 2020 Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians’ Conscience-Based Refusals? Rachel Kogan, JD, Katherine L. Kraschel, JD, and Claudia E. Haupt, PhD, JSD When a clinician refuses to do a procedure consistent with standard of care for a patient, legal resources can be helpful. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E209-216. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209.
Medicine and Society Mar 2020 How Should We Judge Whether and When Mission Statements Are Ethically Deployed? Kellie E. Schueler and Debra B. Stulberg, MD Mission statements offer limited benefit when patients do not have meaningful choices about where to seek care and can be misused. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E239-247. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.239.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 1 Patrick D. Guinan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 2 Malika Haque, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 The Evangelizing Patient, Commentary 1 J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):359-366. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas4-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 The Evangelizing Patient, Commentary 2 John Dunlop, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):359-366. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas4-0505.