AMA Journal of Ethics^®

Although force-feeding prisoners might seem to be in the interests of beneficence and justice, international codes of ethics permit prisoners to refuse nourishment if they make a rational, uncoerced choice to do so.

The American Psychological Association’s ethical guidelines condoning psychologists’ participation in torture, which were motivated by professional self-interest, constitute a violation of medical ethics and international law.

The AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ opinion on physician participation in interrogations.

Physicians who torture historically have not been held accountable by the law or medical profession, but national medical associations can promote accountability.

There is no morally compelling reason to distinguish a doctor from a tank driver on the battlefield except for the fact that both sides agree to protect medical personnel.

Is there an ethical argument that justifies a ban on military recruiters at medical school campuses?