Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Health Law Jul 2019 Regional Unrepresented Patient Advocacy Committee as an Alternative for Decision Making Lisa K. Anderson-Shaw, DrPH, MA, MSN, ANP-BC A UPAC is an alternative to engaging a guardianship court appointment process or to using physicians or ethics committees as decision makers. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E594-599. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.594. Medicine and Society Jul 2019 Who Are “Unrepresented” Patients and What Count as “Important” Medical Decisions for Them? David Ozar, PhD A look at current literature and work by a statewide initiative can motivate development of policies that help respond to unrepresented patients’ needs. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E611-616. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.611. Medicine and Society Jul 2019 Who Should Make Decisions for Unrepresented Patients Who Are Incarcerated? Matthew Tobey, MD, MPH and Lisa Simon, DMD Decisions for patients who are unrepresented and incarcerated could be made by different classes of possible decision makers “inside” and “outside.” AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E617-624. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.617.
Health Law Jul 2019 Regional Unrepresented Patient Advocacy Committee as an Alternative for Decision Making Lisa K. Anderson-Shaw, DrPH, MA, MSN, ANP-BC A UPAC is an alternative to engaging a guardianship court appointment process or to using physicians or ethics committees as decision makers. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E594-599. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.594.
Medicine and Society Jul 2019 Who Are “Unrepresented” Patients and What Count as “Important” Medical Decisions for Them? David Ozar, PhD A look at current literature and work by a statewide initiative can motivate development of policies that help respond to unrepresented patients’ needs. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E611-616. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.611.
Medicine and Society Jul 2019 Who Should Make Decisions for Unrepresented Patients Who Are Incarcerated? Matthew Tobey, MD, MPH and Lisa Simon, DMD Decisions for patients who are unrepresented and incarcerated could be made by different classes of possible decision makers “inside” and “outside.” AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(7):E617-624. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.617.