Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent In the Literature Apr 2016 A Defense of “The Case for Conserving Disability” Jasmine Zahid Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s argument for disability as a sociocultural resource challenges the commonsense understanding of disability as a deficit. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):399-405. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.nlit2-1604. In the Literature Jul 2003 Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research Jeremy Spevick Virtual Mentor. 2003;194-196. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.7.jdsc1-0307. In the Literature May 2003 HIV Policy: Does Most Effective Equal Best? Susanna Smith Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(5):174-177. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.5.jdsc2-0305. In the Literature Dec 2009 Ethics in Consent for HIV Testing Natalie Stein, MD There are advantages and disadvantages associated with requiring explicit testing for HIV. Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(12):959-961. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.12.jdsc1-0912.
In the Literature Apr 2016 A Defense of “The Case for Conserving Disability” Jasmine Zahid Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s argument for disability as a sociocultural resource challenges the commonsense understanding of disability as a deficit. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):399-405. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.nlit2-1604.
In the Literature Jul 2003 Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research Jeremy Spevick Virtual Mentor. 2003;194-196. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.7.jdsc1-0307.
In the Literature May 2003 HIV Policy: Does Most Effective Equal Best? Susanna Smith Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(5):174-177. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.5.jdsc2-0305.
In the Literature Dec 2009 Ethics in Consent for HIV Testing Natalie Stein, MD There are advantages and disadvantages associated with requiring explicit testing for HIV. Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(12):959-961. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.12.jdsc1-0912.