Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Viewpoint May 2020 Overcoming Obstacles to Shared Mental Health Decision Making Laura Guidry-Grimes, PhD Shared decision making is practically difficult to implement in mental health practice but remains an ethical ideal for motivating therapeutic capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E446-451. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.446. Case and Commentary May 2020 How Should Adolescent Health Decision-Making Authority Be Shared? Kimberly Sawyer, MD and Abby R. Rosenberg, MD, MS, MA Shared decision making is complex with patients who are adolescents, whose relational autonomy is still emerging. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E372-379. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.372. Podcast May 2020 Ethics Talk: How to Share Decision Making With People Experiencing Mental Illness Dr Laura Guidry-Grimes helps us consider whether and which decisions can be shared with people experiencing mental illnesses. Health Law Mar 2020 Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians’ Conscience-Based Refusals? Rachel Kogan, JD, Katherine L. Kraschel, JD, and Claudia E. Haupt, PhD, JSD When a clinician refuses to do a procedure consistent with standard of care for a patient, legal resources can be helpful. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E209-216. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209. Medicine and Society Mar 2020 How Should We Judge Whether and When Mission Statements Are Ethically Deployed? Kellie E. Schueler and Debra B. Stulberg, MD Mission statements offer limited benefit when patients do not have meaningful choices about where to seek care and can be misused. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E239-247. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.239. State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604. Case and Commentary Feb 2022 ¿Cómo deben los médicos determinar la disposición de un paciente traumatizado para regresar al trabajo? Tabitha E. H. Moses, MS and Arash Javanbakht, MD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E111-119. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.111. Policy Forum Feb 2022 ¿Cómo deberían los clínicos tácticos ayudar a hacer un uso más justo de la fuerza? David Callaway, MD and Faroukh Mehkri, DO AMA J Ethics. 2022;E133-139. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.133. Policy Forum Feb 2022 ¿Cómo se debería equilibrar el riesgo para el personal táctico con los requerimientos clínicos y ética de rescate? Mollie V. Williams, MD, MPH and Olaitan Ajisafe, MD, PharmD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E140-144. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.140. Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Current page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Viewpoint May 2020 Overcoming Obstacles to Shared Mental Health Decision Making Laura Guidry-Grimes, PhD Shared decision making is practically difficult to implement in mental health practice but remains an ethical ideal for motivating therapeutic capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E446-451. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.446.
Case and Commentary May 2020 How Should Adolescent Health Decision-Making Authority Be Shared? Kimberly Sawyer, MD and Abby R. Rosenberg, MD, MS, MA Shared decision making is complex with patients who are adolescents, whose relational autonomy is still emerging. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E372-379. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.372.
Podcast May 2020 Ethics Talk: How to Share Decision Making With People Experiencing Mental Illness Dr Laura Guidry-Grimes helps us consider whether and which decisions can be shared with people experiencing mental illnesses.
Health Law Mar 2020 Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians’ Conscience-Based Refusals? Rachel Kogan, JD, Katherine L. Kraschel, JD, and Claudia E. Haupt, PhD, JSD When a clinician refuses to do a procedure consistent with standard of care for a patient, legal resources can be helpful. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E209-216. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209.
Medicine and Society Mar 2020 How Should We Judge Whether and When Mission Statements Are Ethically Deployed? Kellie E. Schueler and Debra B. Stulberg, MD Mission statements offer limited benefit when patients do not have meaningful choices about where to seek care and can be misused. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(3):E239-247. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.239.
State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604.
Case and Commentary Feb 2022 ¿Cómo deben los médicos determinar la disposición de un paciente traumatizado para regresar al trabajo? Tabitha E. H. Moses, MS and Arash Javanbakht, MD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E111-119. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.111.
Policy Forum Feb 2022 ¿Cómo deberían los clínicos tácticos ayudar a hacer un uso más justo de la fuerza? David Callaway, MD and Faroukh Mehkri, DO AMA J Ethics. 2022;E133-139. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.133.
Policy Forum Feb 2022 ¿Cómo se debería equilibrar el riesgo para el personal táctico con los requerimientos clínicos y ética de rescate? Mollie V. Williams, MD, MPH and Olaitan Ajisafe, MD, PharmD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E140-144. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.140.
Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145.