Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Policy Forum Nov 2019 Why Quality-of-Life Data Collection and Use Should Be Standardized When Evaluating Candidates for Hand Transplantation Martin Kumnig, PhD, MSc, Emma K. Massey, PhD, and Lisa S. Parker, PhD Improving candidate evaluation and informed consent is key to motivating authenticity, not just voluntariness. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(11):E974-979. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.974. Case and Commentary Dec 2019 How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions? Carolyn Riley Chapman, PhD, MS and Arthur L. Caplan, PhD Responding to patients violating US health commerce regulations can be critical when they buy and use unproven interventions. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1021-1028. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1021. Case and Commentary Dec 2019 How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity? Charis Thompson, PhD Transnational monitoring efforts should focus on safety, defining standard of care, and promoting just access to innovation. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1036-1041. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036. Policy Forum Dec 2019 How Should Gene Editing Be Managed by Risk Managers? David Sine, D.Bioethics Little claims data exists upon which to make informed decisions about loss control or to draw upon when developing risk mitigation strategies. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1059-1064. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1059. Art of Medicine Dec 2019 Sunset Antonio Yaghy, MD This image aims to promote reflection about patients’ feelings of sadness, despair, helplessness, and uncertainty upon being diagnosed. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1103-1104. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1103. State of the Art and Science Feb 2017 Reasonableness, Credibility, and Clinical Disagreement Mary Jean Walker, PhD and Wendy A. Rogers, BMBS, PhD When is a source credible and how do beliefs about a source’s credibility influence assessments of evidence? AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):176-182. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.stas1-1702. Policy Forum Feb 2017 What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations about Medical Evidence? Govind Persad, JD, PhD Procedures for weighing factual evidence could help avoid the epistemic injustice of discounting or ignoring the voices of clinical research subjects. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):183-191. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor1-1702. Policy Forum Feb 2017 Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process James E. Sabin, MD and Norman Daniels, PhD The DSM-5 Task Force’s handling of the ethical controversy over the bereavement exclusion demonstrates the need for more inclusive deliberative processes. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):192-198. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor2-1702. Medical Education Aug 2016 Improving Pathologists’ Communication Skills Suzanne Dintzis, MD, PhD The communication training program at University of Washington Medical Center aims to develop best practices for effective pathology communication. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(8):802-808. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.medu1-1608. Medicine and Society Feb 2017 The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work? Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH, Megan Allyse, PhD, and Frederic W. Hafferty, PhD Dr. Oz’s advice has raised ethical questions about medicine as a profession, its evidentiary standards, and its role in maintaining public trust. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous Page 1 Current page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Policy Forum Nov 2019 Why Quality-of-Life Data Collection and Use Should Be Standardized When Evaluating Candidates for Hand Transplantation Martin Kumnig, PhD, MSc, Emma K. Massey, PhD, and Lisa S. Parker, PhD Improving candidate evaluation and informed consent is key to motivating authenticity, not just voluntariness. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(11):E974-979. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.974.
Case and Commentary Dec 2019 How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions? Carolyn Riley Chapman, PhD, MS and Arthur L. Caplan, PhD Responding to patients violating US health commerce regulations can be critical when they buy and use unproven interventions. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1021-1028. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1021.
Case and Commentary Dec 2019 How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity? Charis Thompson, PhD Transnational monitoring efforts should focus on safety, defining standard of care, and promoting just access to innovation. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1036-1041. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036.
Policy Forum Dec 2019 How Should Gene Editing Be Managed by Risk Managers? David Sine, D.Bioethics Little claims data exists upon which to make informed decisions about loss control or to draw upon when developing risk mitigation strategies. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1059-1064. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1059.
Art of Medicine Dec 2019 Sunset Antonio Yaghy, MD This image aims to promote reflection about patients’ feelings of sadness, despair, helplessness, and uncertainty upon being diagnosed. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1103-1104. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1103.
State of the Art and Science Feb 2017 Reasonableness, Credibility, and Clinical Disagreement Mary Jean Walker, PhD and Wendy A. Rogers, BMBS, PhD When is a source credible and how do beliefs about a source’s credibility influence assessments of evidence? AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):176-182. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.stas1-1702.
Policy Forum Feb 2017 What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations about Medical Evidence? Govind Persad, JD, PhD Procedures for weighing factual evidence could help avoid the epistemic injustice of discounting or ignoring the voices of clinical research subjects. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):183-191. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor1-1702.
Policy Forum Feb 2017 Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process James E. Sabin, MD and Norman Daniels, PhD The DSM-5 Task Force’s handling of the ethical controversy over the bereavement exclusion demonstrates the need for more inclusive deliberative processes. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):192-198. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor2-1702.
Medical Education Aug 2016 Improving Pathologists’ Communication Skills Suzanne Dintzis, MD, PhD The communication training program at University of Washington Medical Center aims to develop best practices for effective pathology communication. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(8):802-808. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.medu1-1608.
Medicine and Society Feb 2017 The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work? Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH, Megan Allyse, PhD, and Frederic W. Hafferty, PhD Dr. Oz’s advice has raised ethical questions about medicine as a profession, its evidentiary standards, and its role in maintaining public trust. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702.