Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Letter to the Editor Oct 2019 Response to “Will We Code for Default ECMO?”: Clarifying the Scope of Do-Not-ECMO Orders Jacob A. Blythe, MA, Sarah E. Wieten, PhD, and Jason N. Batten, MD, MA The authors further consider the merits of preventing ECMO from becoming a default treatment. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(10):E926-929. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.926. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Surrogate Decision Making: Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7-0501. Health Law Oct 2010 Testing Manufacturer Liability in FDA-Approved Device Malfunction Ryan Bailey and Kristin E. Schleiter, JD, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2010;12(10):800-803. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.10.hlaw1-1010. Policy Forum May 2010 An Argument Against the Feasibility of Taxing Cosmetic Surgery Lauren Sydney Flicker, JD, MBE and Rachel Zuraw, JD, MBE Taxing cosmetic procedures does not accord with the standard taxing principles of horizontal and vertical equity. Such a tax would be difficult to enforce and could be discriminatory. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12(5):395-400. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.5.pfor1-1005. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Assessment Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7a-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7b-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Additional Information Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501.
Letter to the Editor Oct 2019 Response to “Will We Code for Default ECMO?”: Clarifying the Scope of Do-Not-ECMO Orders Jacob A. Blythe, MA, Sarah E. Wieten, PhD, and Jason N. Batten, MD, MA The authors further consider the merits of preventing ECMO from becoming a default treatment. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(10):E926-929. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.926.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Surrogate Decision Making: Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7-0501.
Health Law Oct 2010 Testing Manufacturer Liability in FDA-Approved Device Malfunction Ryan Bailey and Kristin E. Schleiter, JD, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2010;12(10):800-803. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.10.hlaw1-1010.
Policy Forum May 2010 An Argument Against the Feasibility of Taxing Cosmetic Surgery Lauren Sydney Flicker, JD, MBE and Rachel Zuraw, JD, MBE Taxing cosmetic procedures does not accord with the standard taxing principles of horizontal and vertical equity. Such a tax would be difficult to enforce and could be discriminatory. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12(5):395-400. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.5.pfor1-1005.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Assessment Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7a-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7b-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Additional Information Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501.