Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352. Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358. Case and Commentary Apr 2021 是否应该为了推动其他自由而去限制某种自由? Katherine J. Feder (理学硕士), Janice I. Firn(理学博士、注册硕士社会工作者), and Ryan Stork(医学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305. Case and Commentary Apr 2021 ¿Debería limitarse un tipo de libertad a favor de otro? Katherine J. Feder, MS, Janice I. Firn, PhD, and Ryan Stork, MD AMA J Ethics. 2021;E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305. Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Optional Treatments and Quality of Life, Commentary 1 Mary Jane Massie, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):141-147. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas2-0502. Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Optional Treatments and Quality of Life, Commentary 2 Johannes Gobertus Meran, MD, MA Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):141-147. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas2-0502. State of the Art and Science May 2018 Defining “Community” and “Consultation” for Emergency Research that Requires an Exception from Informed Consent Samuel A. Tisherman, MD Emergency research that requires exception from informed consent presents challenges in defining and reaching the at-risk community. AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(5):467-474. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.stas1-1805. Health Law Nov 2004 Wright v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: Maintaining Patient and Public Trust in Clinical Research Laura Lin, MBA and Bryan A. Liang, MD, PhD, JD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(11):501-504. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.11.hlaw1-0411. Podcast Oct 2021 Author Interview: How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined? Drs Pringl Miller, Preeti John, and Sabha Ganai join Ethics Talk to discuss their article: “How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined?” Case and Commentary Apr 2021 Should One Kind of Freedom Be Restricted to Promote Another? Katherine J. Feder, MS, Janice I. Firn, PhD, LMSW, and Ryan Stork, MD Restraint can facilitate freedom for patients with traumatic brain injuries under some conditions. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(4):E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352.
Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358.
Case and Commentary Apr 2021 是否应该为了推动其他自由而去限制某种自由? Katherine J. Feder (理学硕士), Janice I. Firn(理学博士、注册硕士社会工作者), and Ryan Stork(医学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305.
Case and Commentary Apr 2021 ¿Debería limitarse un tipo de libertad a favor de otro? Katherine J. Feder, MS, Janice I. Firn, PhD, and Ryan Stork, MD AMA J Ethics. 2021;E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305.
Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Optional Treatments and Quality of Life, Commentary 1 Mary Jane Massie, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):141-147. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas2-0502.
Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Optional Treatments and Quality of Life, Commentary 2 Johannes Gobertus Meran, MD, MA Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):141-147. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas2-0502.
State of the Art and Science May 2018 Defining “Community” and “Consultation” for Emergency Research that Requires an Exception from Informed Consent Samuel A. Tisherman, MD Emergency research that requires exception from informed consent presents challenges in defining and reaching the at-risk community. AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(5):467-474. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.stas1-1805.
Health Law Nov 2004 Wright v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: Maintaining Patient and Public Trust in Clinical Research Laura Lin, MBA and Bryan A. Liang, MD, PhD, JD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(11):501-504. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.11.hlaw1-0411.
Podcast Oct 2021 Author Interview: How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined? Drs Pringl Miller, Preeti John, and Sabha Ganai join Ethics Talk to discuss their article: “How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined?”
Case and Commentary Apr 2021 Should One Kind of Freedom Be Restricted to Promote Another? Katherine J. Feder, MS, Janice I. Firn, PhD, LMSW, and Ryan Stork, MD Restraint can facilitate freedom for patients with traumatic brain injuries under some conditions. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(4):E305-310. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.305.