Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Jan 2021 当医生发现其患者被强制绝育时应如何应对? Rebecca Kluchin(理学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E18-25. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.18. Case and Commentary Apr 2021 作为临床和伦理目标,临床医生应如何以同情心执行重要强制干预,而非仅仅将伤害最小化? Robert L. Trestman(理学博士、医学博士) and Kishore Nagaraja(医学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E292-297. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.292. Case and Commentary Apr 2021 ¿Cómo deberían los médicos clínicos ejecutar intervenciones con medidas de fuerza críticas para salvar una vida con compasión, no solo para minimizar el daño, como un objetivo clínico y ético? Robert L. Trestman, PhD, MD and Kishore Nagaraja, MD AMA J Ethics. 2021;E292-297. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.292. Case and Commentary Dec 2020 What Should We Do When Families Refuse Testing for Brain Death? Robert D. Truog, MD, MA, Wynne Morrison, MD, MBE, and Matthew Kirschen, MD, PhD Two commentaries respond to a case about apnea testing to confirm death by neurologic criteria. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(12):E986-994. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.986. Policy Forum Dec 2020 Guidance for Physicians Who Wish to Influence Policy Development on Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria Michael A. Rubin, MD, MA Lobbying, maintaining diagnostic skill, participating in national societies, and contributing to robust discourse can influence practice and policy. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(12):E1033-1037. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1033. Case and Commentary Jan 2021 How Should Clinicians’ Involvement in the Holocaust Inform Contemporary Responsibilities to Protect Public Safety? Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH Perils of physicians intentionally harming individuals in errant attempts to strengthen a community have been illuminated by the Holocaust. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E6-11. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.6. Case and Commentary Jan 2021 How Should a Physician Respond to Discovering Her Patient Has Been Forcibly Sterilized? Rebecca Kluchin, PhD Sterilization requires physicians’ surgical skills. Forced sterilization requires many clinicians’ complicity. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E18-25. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.18. State of the Art and Science Jan 2021 “Prevention” and Human Gene Editing Governance Eric T. Juengst, PhD The Holocaust and the racial hygiene doctrine that helped rationalize it still overshadow contemporary debates about using gene editing for disease prevention. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E49-54. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.49. Art of Medicine Feb 2021 Climate Change and Health Equity Nealie Tan Ngo Because climate change will likely exacerbate national and international health inequity, this comic considers our future. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(2):E201-203. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.201. Medicine and Society Apr 2016 Reproductive Rights and Access to Reproductive Services for Women with Disabilities Anita Silvers, PhD, Leslie Francis, JD, PhD, and Brittany Badesch Women with disabilities may be prevented access to reproductive medicine due to discrimination and mistaken assumptions about disabled people. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):430-437. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.msoc1-1604. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Current page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Jan 2021 当医生发现其患者被强制绝育时应如何应对? Rebecca Kluchin(理学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E18-25. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.18.
Case and Commentary Apr 2021 作为临床和伦理目标,临床医生应如何以同情心执行重要强制干预,而非仅仅将伤害最小化? Robert L. Trestman(理学博士、医学博士) and Kishore Nagaraja(医学博士) AMA J Ethics. 2021;E292-297. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.292.
Case and Commentary Apr 2021 ¿Cómo deberían los médicos clínicos ejecutar intervenciones con medidas de fuerza críticas para salvar una vida con compasión, no solo para minimizar el daño, como un objetivo clínico y ético? Robert L. Trestman, PhD, MD and Kishore Nagaraja, MD AMA J Ethics. 2021;E292-297. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.292.
Case and Commentary Dec 2020 What Should We Do When Families Refuse Testing for Brain Death? Robert D. Truog, MD, MA, Wynne Morrison, MD, MBE, and Matthew Kirschen, MD, PhD Two commentaries respond to a case about apnea testing to confirm death by neurologic criteria. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(12):E986-994. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.986.
Policy Forum Dec 2020 Guidance for Physicians Who Wish to Influence Policy Development on Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria Michael A. Rubin, MD, MA Lobbying, maintaining diagnostic skill, participating in national societies, and contributing to robust discourse can influence practice and policy. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(12):E1033-1037. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1033.
Case and Commentary Jan 2021 How Should Clinicians’ Involvement in the Holocaust Inform Contemporary Responsibilities to Protect Public Safety? Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH Perils of physicians intentionally harming individuals in errant attempts to strengthen a community have been illuminated by the Holocaust. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E6-11. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.6.
Case and Commentary Jan 2021 How Should a Physician Respond to Discovering Her Patient Has Been Forcibly Sterilized? Rebecca Kluchin, PhD Sterilization requires physicians’ surgical skills. Forced sterilization requires many clinicians’ complicity. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E18-25. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.18.
State of the Art and Science Jan 2021 “Prevention” and Human Gene Editing Governance Eric T. Juengst, PhD The Holocaust and the racial hygiene doctrine that helped rationalize it still overshadow contemporary debates about using gene editing for disease prevention. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(1):E49-54. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.49.
Art of Medicine Feb 2021 Climate Change and Health Equity Nealie Tan Ngo Because climate change will likely exacerbate national and international health inequity, this comic considers our future. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(2):E201-203. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.201.
Medicine and Society Apr 2016 Reproductive Rights and Access to Reproductive Services for Women with Disabilities Anita Silvers, PhD, Leslie Francis, JD, PhD, and Brittany Badesch Women with disabilities may be prevented access to reproductive medicine due to discrimination and mistaken assumptions about disabled people. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):430-437. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.msoc1-1604.