Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent State of the Art and Science May 2016 Health Care Ethics Consultation via Telemedicine: Linking Expert Clinical Ethicists and Local Consultants Alexander A. Kon, MD and Maj. Robert J. Walter, MD, DHCE Successful telemedicine ethics consultation requires knowledge of relevant laws and, for videoconferences, the physical presence of a meeting leader. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(5):514-520. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.5.stas1-1605. State of the Art and Science May 2016 International Access to Clinical Ethics Consultation via Telemedicine Katrina A. Bramstedt, PhD, MA Telemedicine is fast becoming a reliable medium for convening ethics deliberations and bringing expert assistance to remote locations. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(5):521-527. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.5.stas2-1605. Letter to the Editor Oct 2017 Response to “What Should Physicians Do When They Disagree, Clinically and Ethically, with a Surrogate’s Wishes?” Petros Ioannou, MD, MSc, PhD Understanding the religious background of patients and their surrogates is essential to providing patient-centered care at the end of life. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(10):1051-1053. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.corr3-1710. Medical Education Jun 2016 Healing Medicine’s Future: Prioritizing Physician Trainee Mental Health Kathryn Baker, MD and Srijan Sen, MD, PhD High rates of burnout and depression among residents underscore the need for innovative ways to promote wellness, mental health awareness. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(6):604-613. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.6.medu1-1606. Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352. Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358. Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145. Health Law May 2022 Does Regulating Dietary Supplements as Food in a World of Social Media Influencers Promote Public Safety? Joshua J. Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary supplements can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(5):E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396. Case and Commentary Jun 2022 How Should Health Systems Help Clinicians Manage Bias Against Ex-combatants? Christopher W. Reynolds and Camilo Sánchez Meertens, MPP Clinicians in postconflict health care settings can be tasked with caring for patients who were enemies. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E483-488. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.483. Health Law Jun 2022 Survivor-Centered Approaches to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Klearchos A. Kyriakides, PhD, MPhil and Andreas K. Demetriades, MBBChir, MPhil During or after conflict, a clinician might be required to provide evidence to an official investigatory body or court. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E495-517. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.495. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
State of the Art and Science May 2016 Health Care Ethics Consultation via Telemedicine: Linking Expert Clinical Ethicists and Local Consultants Alexander A. Kon, MD and Maj. Robert J. Walter, MD, DHCE Successful telemedicine ethics consultation requires knowledge of relevant laws and, for videoconferences, the physical presence of a meeting leader. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(5):514-520. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.5.stas1-1605.
State of the Art and Science May 2016 International Access to Clinical Ethics Consultation via Telemedicine Katrina A. Bramstedt, PhD, MA Telemedicine is fast becoming a reliable medium for convening ethics deliberations and bringing expert assistance to remote locations. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(5):521-527. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.5.stas2-1605.
Letter to the Editor Oct 2017 Response to “What Should Physicians Do When They Disagree, Clinically and Ethically, with a Surrogate’s Wishes?” Petros Ioannou, MD, MSc, PhD Understanding the religious background of patients and their surrogates is essential to providing patient-centered care at the end of life. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(10):1051-1053. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.corr3-1710.
Medical Education Jun 2016 Healing Medicine’s Future: Prioritizing Physician Trainee Mental Health Kathryn Baker, MD and Srijan Sen, MD, PhD High rates of burnout and depression among residents underscore the need for innovative ways to promote wellness, mental health awareness. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(6):604-613. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.6.medu1-1606.
Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352.
Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358.
Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145.
Health Law May 2022 Does Regulating Dietary Supplements as Food in a World of Social Media Influencers Promote Public Safety? Joshua J. Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary supplements can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(5):E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396.
Case and Commentary Jun 2022 How Should Health Systems Help Clinicians Manage Bias Against Ex-combatants? Christopher W. Reynolds and Camilo Sánchez Meertens, MPP Clinicians in postconflict health care settings can be tasked with caring for patients who were enemies. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E483-488. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.483.
Health Law Jun 2022 Survivor-Centered Approaches to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Klearchos A. Kyriakides, PhD, MPhil and Andreas K. Demetriades, MBBChir, MPhil During or after conflict, a clinician might be required to provide evidence to an official investigatory body or court. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E495-517. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.495.