Overturning this case’s precedent might result in clinicians claiming more religious exemptions and increased risk of harm to patients.

Lack of ethical, legal, and clinical consensus about best practice sometimes combines with a poor clinical evidence base.

When responding to an ad for a job caring for patient-detainees along the US southern border, applicants should anticipate the need to navigate dual loyalties.

Force feeding, unnecessary x-rays, misusing health information, and discharging unstable patients are classic dual-loyalty dilemmas reminiscent of the Holocaust.

Some refugees’ illness experiences preclude them from testifying and accurately representing their own interests during asylum adjudication proceedings.

As health professionals, DACA recipients increase diversity in the health care work force and are well positioned to promote health equity.

Clinicians must avoid violating professional ethical principles and patients’ legal rights and they may not ever discriminate. So, what does that mean in practice?

This drawing portrays 3 perspectives on deliberate emergent dialysis for undocumented immigrants with kidney disease.

For an adolescent patient with extreme anorexia nervosa, steps for expressing compassion during a force intervention need to be clear.