Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Policy Forum Dec 2019 Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation? Alessandro Blasimme, PhD International debate about human genome editing governance has undergone a paradigm shift and suggests that inclusive public deliberation is still important. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1065. Policy Forum Mar 2016 Medical Malpractice Reform: Historical Approaches, Alternative Models, and Communication and Resolution Programs Joseph S. Kass, MD, JD and Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA Alternatives to suing could help open communication between injured patients and clinicians. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(3):299-310. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor6-1603. Policy Forum Mar 2004 Content of Medical Error Disclosures Thomas H. Gallagher, MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(3):132-135. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.3.pfor1-0403.
Policy Forum Dec 2019 Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation? Alessandro Blasimme, PhD International debate about human genome editing governance has undergone a paradigm shift and suggests that inclusive public deliberation is still important. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1065.
Policy Forum Mar 2016 Medical Malpractice Reform: Historical Approaches, Alternative Models, and Communication and Resolution Programs Joseph S. Kass, MD, JD and Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA Alternatives to suing could help open communication between injured patients and clinicians. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(3):299-310. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor6-1603.
Policy Forum Mar 2004 Content of Medical Error Disclosures Thomas H. Gallagher, MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(3):132-135. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.3.pfor1-0403.