Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Jan 2005 An Inoperable Cancer, Option Comparison Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):74-79. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas13b-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 An Inoperable Cancer, Additional Information Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):68-73. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas13c-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Option Assessment Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14a-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14b-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Additional Information Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14c-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions, Option Assessment Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15a-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions Option Comparison Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15b-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions, Additional Information Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15c-0501. Case and Commentary Mar 2009 Is There a Duty to Inform Patients of Phase I Trials? Commentary 1 Courtenay R. Bruce, JD and Anne Lederman Flamm, JD Physicians must ask themselves ethical questions before recommending participation in phase I trials to patients. Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(3):207-211. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.3.ccas2-0903. Case and Commentary Mar 2009 When Patient and Physician Disagree on Patient’s “Best Interest” Ryan Blum Should physicians engage beliefs and practices that do not agree with their medical judgment as a means to securing patient adherence to recommended treatment? Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(3):223-227. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.3.call1-0903. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Current page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 An Inoperable Cancer, Option Comparison Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):74-79. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas13b-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 An Inoperable Cancer, Additional Information Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):68-73. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas13c-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Option Assessment Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14a-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14b-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Scott's Plan for the Future, Additional Information Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):80-86. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas14c-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions, Option Assessment Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15a-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions Option Comparison Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15b-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respecting Patients' End-of-Life Decisions, Additional Information Karine Morin, LLM Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):87-95. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas15c-0501.
Case and Commentary Mar 2009 Is There a Duty to Inform Patients of Phase I Trials? Commentary 1 Courtenay R. Bruce, JD and Anne Lederman Flamm, JD Physicians must ask themselves ethical questions before recommending participation in phase I trials to patients. Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(3):207-211. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.3.ccas2-0903.
Case and Commentary Mar 2009 When Patient and Physician Disagree on Patient’s “Best Interest” Ryan Blum Should physicians engage beliefs and practices that do not agree with their medical judgment as a means to securing patient adherence to recommended treatment? Virtual Mentor. 2009;11(3):223-227. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.3.call1-0903.