Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Case and Commentary Sep 2007 Pregnant Women Who Smoke: A Challenge to the Patient-Physician Relationship Jennifer Hernandez, MD and Scott Roberts, MD When the patient delivers a low-birth-weight infant that requires extensive time in the neonatal intensive, should she be held responsible? Where do we draw the line? More importantly, on what basis do we draw the line? Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(9):611-614. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.9.ccas3-0709. Case and Commentary Jan 2004 Physician Activism and Civil Disobedience, Commentary 1 Tom Tomlinson, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(1):16-19. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.1.ccas3-0401. Case and Commentary Jan 2004 Physician Activism and Civil Disobedience, Commentary 2 Barry DeCoster, MA Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(1):20-23. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.1.ccas3-0401. Case and Commentary Sep 2004 Reproductive Rights, Commentary 1 Watson A. Bowes Jr., MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(9):387-389. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.9.ccas2-0409. Case and Commentary Sep 2004 Reproductive Rights, Commentary 2 Karen E. Adams, MD and Martin T. Donohoe, MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(9):389-391. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.9.ccas2-0409. Case and Commentary Aug 2003 Faith-Based Decisions: Parents Who Refuse Appropriate Care for Their Children, Commentary 2 William E. Novotny, MD and Ronald M. Perkin, MD, MA Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(8):296-299. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.8.ccas1-0308. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.
Case and Commentary Sep 2007 Pregnant Women Who Smoke: A Challenge to the Patient-Physician Relationship Jennifer Hernandez, MD and Scott Roberts, MD When the patient delivers a low-birth-weight infant that requires extensive time in the neonatal intensive, should she be held responsible? Where do we draw the line? More importantly, on what basis do we draw the line? Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(9):611-614. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.9.ccas3-0709.
Case and Commentary Jan 2004 Physician Activism and Civil Disobedience, Commentary 1 Tom Tomlinson, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(1):16-19. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.1.ccas3-0401.
Case and Commentary Jan 2004 Physician Activism and Civil Disobedience, Commentary 2 Barry DeCoster, MA Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(1):20-23. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.1.ccas3-0401.
Case and Commentary Sep 2004 Reproductive Rights, Commentary 1 Watson A. Bowes Jr., MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(9):387-389. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.9.ccas2-0409.
Case and Commentary Sep 2004 Reproductive Rights, Commentary 2 Karen E. Adams, MD and Martin T. Donohoe, MD Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(9):389-391. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.9.ccas2-0409.
Case and Commentary Aug 2003 Faith-Based Decisions: Parents Who Refuse Appropriate Care for Their Children, Commentary 2 William E. Novotny, MD and Ronald M. Perkin, MD, MA Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(8):296-299. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.8.ccas1-0308.