Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent In the Literature Apr 2016 A Defense of “The Case for Conserving Disability” Jasmine Zahid Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s argument for disability as a sociocultural resource challenges the commonsense understanding of disability as a deficit. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):399-405. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.nlit2-1604. State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604. Case and Commentary Feb 2016 Should Physicians Attempt to Persuade a Patient to Accept a Compromised Organ for Transplant? Andy A. Tully, MD, Geraldine C. Diaz, DO, and John F. Renz, MD, PhD Transplant physicians must respect indecisive patients’ autonomy while continuing to educate them during their progress towards transplantation. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(2):101-107. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.18.2.ecas1-1602. Case and Commentary Feb 2016 How to Communicate Clearly about Brain Death and First-Person Consent to Donate Stuart J. Youngner, MD Despite clear donor consent, health professionals must communicate clearly about death to family members to avoid confusion. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(2):108-114. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.18.2.ecas2-1602. Policy Forum Mar 2016 Medical Malpractice Reform: Historical Approaches, Alternative Models, and Communication and Resolution Programs Joseph S. Kass, MD, JD and Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA Alternatives to suing could help open communication between injured patients and clinicians. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(3):299-310. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor6-1603. State of the Art and Science Aug 2022 What Should Clinicians and Patients Know About the Clinical Gaze, Disability, and Iatrogenic Harm When Making Decisions? Chloë G. K. Atkins, PhD and Sunit Das, MD, PhD Avoiding harm requires that clinicians not overly rely on assumptions about “normal” embodiment. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2022; 24(8):E762-767. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.762. Case and Commentary Feb 2023 How Should Clinicians Minimize Bias When Responding to Suspicions About Child Abuse? Megan M. Letson, MD, MEd and Kristin G. Crichton, DO, MPH Following evidence-based approaches to evaluating and reporting suspicion of child maltreatment can help minimize bias and promote equity. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E93-99. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.93. Case and Commentary Feb 2023 How Should Race and Resource Context Influence How Neglect Is Considered by Clinicians? David Kelly, JD, MA and Jerry Milner, DSW Separation of children from their parents is one possible traumatizing consequence of a mandated report, which is not to be taken lightly. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E100-108. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.100. Medical Education Feb 2023 How Should Clinicians and Students Cope With Secondary Trauma When Caring for Children Traumatized by Abuse or Neglect? Colleen E. Bennett, MD, MSHP and Cindy W. Christian, MD When health care professionals encounter child abuse and neglect, they tend to experience a range of emotions, such as anger, sadness, and frustration. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E109-115. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.109. Health Law Feb 2023 McGirt v Oklahoma and What Clinicians Should Know About Present-Day Child Abuse and Legacies of Forced Migration Amy D. Hendrix-Dicken, MA, Sarah J. Passmore, DO, Michael A. Baxter, DO, and Lauren K. Conway, DO One Supreme Court decision has historic significance for child abuse pediatricians working with multidisciplinary care and legal teams. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E123-129. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.123. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous … Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Current page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
In the Literature Apr 2016 A Defense of “The Case for Conserving Disability” Jasmine Zahid Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s argument for disability as a sociocultural resource challenges the commonsense understanding of disability as a deficit. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):399-405. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.nlit2-1604.
State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604.
Case and Commentary Feb 2016 Should Physicians Attempt to Persuade a Patient to Accept a Compromised Organ for Transplant? Andy A. Tully, MD, Geraldine C. Diaz, DO, and John F. Renz, MD, PhD Transplant physicians must respect indecisive patients’ autonomy while continuing to educate them during their progress towards transplantation. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(2):101-107. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.18.2.ecas1-1602.
Case and Commentary Feb 2016 How to Communicate Clearly about Brain Death and First-Person Consent to Donate Stuart J. Youngner, MD Despite clear donor consent, health professionals must communicate clearly about death to family members to avoid confusion. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(2):108-114. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.18.2.ecas2-1602.
Policy Forum Mar 2016 Medical Malpractice Reform: Historical Approaches, Alternative Models, and Communication and Resolution Programs Joseph S. Kass, MD, JD and Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA Alternatives to suing could help open communication between injured patients and clinicians. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(3):299-310. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.3.pfor6-1603.
State of the Art and Science Aug 2022 What Should Clinicians and Patients Know About the Clinical Gaze, Disability, and Iatrogenic Harm When Making Decisions? Chloë G. K. Atkins, PhD and Sunit Das, MD, PhD Avoiding harm requires that clinicians not overly rely on assumptions about “normal” embodiment. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2022; 24(8):E762-767. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.762.
Case and Commentary Feb 2023 How Should Clinicians Minimize Bias When Responding to Suspicions About Child Abuse? Megan M. Letson, MD, MEd and Kristin G. Crichton, DO, MPH Following evidence-based approaches to evaluating and reporting suspicion of child maltreatment can help minimize bias and promote equity. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E93-99. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.93.
Case and Commentary Feb 2023 How Should Race and Resource Context Influence How Neglect Is Considered by Clinicians? David Kelly, JD, MA and Jerry Milner, DSW Separation of children from their parents is one possible traumatizing consequence of a mandated report, which is not to be taken lightly. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E100-108. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.100.
Medical Education Feb 2023 How Should Clinicians and Students Cope With Secondary Trauma When Caring for Children Traumatized by Abuse or Neglect? Colleen E. Bennett, MD, MSHP and Cindy W. Christian, MD When health care professionals encounter child abuse and neglect, they tend to experience a range of emotions, such as anger, sadness, and frustration. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E109-115. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.109.
Health Law Feb 2023 McGirt v Oklahoma and What Clinicians Should Know About Present-Day Child Abuse and Legacies of Forced Migration Amy D. Hendrix-Dicken, MA, Sarah J. Passmore, DO, Michael A. Baxter, DO, and Lauren K. Conway, DO One Supreme Court decision has historic significance for child abuse pediatricians working with multidisciplinary care and legal teams. Read in: English AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(2):E123-129. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.123.