Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. Medicine and Society Nov 2019 What Are Good Guidelines for Evaluating Uterus Transplantation? Margaret Horvat, MA and Ana Iltis, PhD Recent advances in UTx suggest it is on a trajectory toward becoming an accepted clinical practice to treat absolute uterine factor infertility. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E988-995. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.988. Medicine and Society Nov 2019 What Hand Transplantation Teaches Us About Embodiment Brock Bahler, PhD Current QoL conversations in HTx could be enhanced by a phenomenological account of temporality, embodiment, and intersubjectivity. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E996-1002. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.996. Policy Forum Nov 2019 Why Quality-of-Life Data Collection and Use Should Be Standardized When Evaluating Candidates for Hand Transplantation Martin Kumnig, PhD, MSc, Emma K. Massey, PhD, and Lisa S. Parker, PhD Improving candidate evaluation and informed consent is key to motivating authenticity, not just voluntariness. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E974-979. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.974. Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. State of the Art and Science Feb 2017 Reasonableness, Credibility, and Clinical Disagreement Mary Jean Walker, PhD and Wendy A. Rogers, BMBS, PhD When is a source credible and how do beliefs about a source’s credibility influence assessments of evidence? AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):176-182. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.stas1-1702. Policy Forum Feb 2017 What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations about Medical Evidence? Govind Persad, JD, PhD Procedures for weighing factual evidence could help avoid the epistemic injustice of discounting or ignoring the voices of clinical research subjects. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):183-191. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor1-1702. Policy Forum Feb 2017 Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process James E. Sabin, MD and Norman Daniels, PhD The DSM-5 Task Force’s handling of the ethical controversy over the bereavement exclusion demonstrates the need for more inclusive deliberative processes. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):192-198. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor2-1702. Medicine and Society Feb 2017 The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work? Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH, Megan Allyse, PhD, and Frederic W. Hafferty, PhD Dr. Oz’s advice has raised ethical questions about medicine as a profession, its evidentiary standards, and its role in maintaining public trust. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702. Case and Commentary Jul 2019 Should Aggregate Patient Preference Data Be Used to Make Decisions on Behalf of Unrepresented Patients? Nathaniel Sharadin, PhD, MA Ethical and practical problems with preference modeling can undermine how reliably predictors can be used in high-stakes decisions. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(7):E566-574. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.566. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous Page 1 Current page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
Medicine and Society Nov 2019 What Are Good Guidelines for Evaluating Uterus Transplantation? Margaret Horvat, MA and Ana Iltis, PhD Recent advances in UTx suggest it is on a trajectory toward becoming an accepted clinical practice to treat absolute uterine factor infertility. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E988-995. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.988.
Medicine and Society Nov 2019 What Hand Transplantation Teaches Us About Embodiment Brock Bahler, PhD Current QoL conversations in HTx could be enhanced by a phenomenological account of temporality, embodiment, and intersubjectivity. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E996-1002. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.996.
Policy Forum Nov 2019 Why Quality-of-Life Data Collection and Use Should Be Standardized When Evaluating Candidates for Hand Transplantation Martin Kumnig, PhD, MSc, Emma K. Massey, PhD, and Lisa S. Parker, PhD Improving candidate evaluation and informed consent is key to motivating authenticity, not just voluntariness. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E974-979. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.974.
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
State of the Art and Science Feb 2017 Reasonableness, Credibility, and Clinical Disagreement Mary Jean Walker, PhD and Wendy A. Rogers, BMBS, PhD When is a source credible and how do beliefs about a source’s credibility influence assessments of evidence? AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):176-182. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.stas1-1702.
Policy Forum Feb 2017 What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations about Medical Evidence? Govind Persad, JD, PhD Procedures for weighing factual evidence could help avoid the epistemic injustice of discounting or ignoring the voices of clinical research subjects. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):183-191. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor1-1702.
Policy Forum Feb 2017 Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process James E. Sabin, MD and Norman Daniels, PhD The DSM-5 Task Force’s handling of the ethical controversy over the bereavement exclusion demonstrates the need for more inclusive deliberative processes. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):192-198. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor2-1702.
Medicine and Society Feb 2017 The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work? Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH, Megan Allyse, PhD, and Frederic W. Hafferty, PhD Dr. Oz’s advice has raised ethical questions about medicine as a profession, its evidentiary standards, and its role in maintaining public trust. AMA J Ethics. 2017; 19(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702.
Case and Commentary Jul 2019 Should Aggregate Patient Preference Data Be Used to Make Decisions on Behalf of Unrepresented Patients? Nathaniel Sharadin, PhD, MA Ethical and practical problems with preference modeling can undermine how reliably predictors can be used in high-stakes decisions. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(7):E566-574. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.566.