Guidance from the Code addresses legitimacy and trustworthiness of information from unethical experimentation.

Antiracism practices in museums inform how clinicians can orient themselves to their professions’ roles in the Holocaust.

Immorally acquired information, from Nazi experimentation or other sources, infects the body of scientific and biomedical knowledge.

Carefully distinguishing between when the Nazi analogy is aptly applied and when it is not is key to ongoing PAD legalization deliberations.

This article considers relevant history that informs the AMA Code of Medical Ethics' opinions about neurological criteria for death.

Lobbying, maintaining diagnostic skill, participating in national societies, and contributing to robust discourse can influence practice and policy.

The DDR requires organ donors to be dead according to legal criteria prior to organ removal, and it’s rooted in fears of civil and criminal liability.

For many physicians, lack of understanding about brain death leads to confusion and muddles interactions with patients’ loved ones at the end of life.

Two commentaries respond to a case about apnea testing to confirm death by neurologic criteria.

Since 1968, ethical questions about brain death have become “well settled,” yet remain “persistently unresolved.”