Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Prenatal Risk Assessment and Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Strategies for Communicating Well with Patients Eva Schwartz, MD and Kishore Vellody, MD Physicians should provide women considering abortion after Down syndrome screening with unbiased information and not attempt to influence their decision. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):359-364. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas1-1604. Case and Commentary May 2006 Physician Values and Clinical Decision Making, Commentary 1 Jack Drescher, MD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):303-306. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.ccas2-0605. Case and Commentary May 2006 Physician Values and Clinical Decision Making, Commentary 2 Andrew Fergusson, MB, MRCGP Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):306-308. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.ccas2-0605. Case and Commentary Jan 2006 Informed Refusal, Commentary 1 Howard Brody, MD, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):24-26. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.ccas4-0601. Case and Commentary Jan 2006 Informed Refusal, Commentary 2 Ruth Jepson, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):26-29. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.ccas4-0601. Viewpoint Jan 2006 Is Prenatal Genetic Screening Unjustly Discriminatory? Jeff McMahan, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):50-52. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped1-0601. Viewpoint Jan 2006 The Uncertain Rationale for Prenatal Disability Screening David Wasserman, JD and Adrienne Asch, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53-56. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped2-0601. State of the Art and Science Dec 2016 Locating Risk in the Adolescent Brain: Ethical Challenges in the Use of Biomarkers for Adolescent Health and Social Policy Suparna Choudhury, PhD and Sheehan Moore Neurobiological markers raise complex questions about what it means to be “at risk.” AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(12):1199-1206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.stas1-1612. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Prenatal Risk Assessment and Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Strategies for Communicating Well with Patients Eva Schwartz, MD and Kishore Vellody, MD Physicians should provide women considering abortion after Down syndrome screening with unbiased information and not attempt to influence their decision. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):359-364. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas1-1604.
Case and Commentary May 2006 Physician Values and Clinical Decision Making, Commentary 1 Jack Drescher, MD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):303-306. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.ccas2-0605.
Case and Commentary May 2006 Physician Values and Clinical Decision Making, Commentary 2 Andrew Fergusson, MB, MRCGP Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):306-308. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.ccas2-0605.
Case and Commentary Jan 2006 Informed Refusal, Commentary 1 Howard Brody, MD, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):24-26. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.ccas4-0601.
Case and Commentary Jan 2006 Informed Refusal, Commentary 2 Ruth Jepson, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):26-29. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.ccas4-0601.
Viewpoint Jan 2006 Is Prenatal Genetic Screening Unjustly Discriminatory? Jeff McMahan, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):50-52. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped1-0601.
Viewpoint Jan 2006 The Uncertain Rationale for Prenatal Disability Screening David Wasserman, JD and Adrienne Asch, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53-56. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped2-0601.
State of the Art and Science Dec 2016 Locating Risk in the Adolescent Brain: Ethical Challenges in the Use of Biomarkers for Adolescent Health and Social Policy Suparna Choudhury, PhD and Sheehan Moore Neurobiological markers raise complex questions about what it means to be “at risk.” AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(12):1199-1206. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.stas1-1612.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 1 Farr Curlin, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patient Counseling and Matters of Conscience, Commentary 2 Rev. Russell Burck, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):352-358. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas3-0505.