Dr John Banja joins us to discuss the promises and perils of artificial intelligence in health care applications, including potential “megarisks” posed by AI tools themselves.

When responding to an ad for a job caring for patient-detainees along the US southern border, applicants should anticipate the need to navigate dual loyalties.

Force feeding, unnecessary x-rays, misusing health information, and discharging unstable patients are classic dual-loyalty dilemmas reminiscent of the Holocaust.

Some refugees’ illness experiences preclude them from testifying and accurately representing their own interests during asylum adjudication proceedings.

Being marked as an “other” outside of the circle of human concern expresses tension between principles of liberty and equality and exacerbates health inequity.

Ethical obligations to address racial health inequity in American life exist now, just as they did in 1865.

Injustice is endemic to IHS operations when its stewards are forced to defer payment for patients’ nonemergent care.

To achieve health equity, governments can use a variety of tools, including civil rights legislation and constitutional jurisprudence.