Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Health Law May 2007 Duty to Treat: Conscience and Pluralism Kayhan Parsi, JD, PhD Physicians have a right to conscientiously object to procedures and therapies that they find to be morally objectionable. Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(5):362-364. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.5.hlaw1-0705. Medicine and Society May 2006 Obligation To Provide Services: A Physician-Public Defender Comparison June M. McKoy, MD, MPH, JD A physician attorney argues that the best way to ensure that physicians don't refuse to treat patients is to create a system in which their medical education is fully funded and they must repay a debt to society. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):332-334. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.msoc1-0605. Medicine and Society May 2006 Professional Demands and Religious Observance Mahendr S. Kochar, MD Physicians should not allow their religious beliefs to influence their clinical judgment or the time they spend with patients. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):335-336. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.msoc2-0605. Case and Commentary Feb 2003 Does Patient Autonomy Outweigh Duty to Treat? Catherine A. Marco, MD Patients can refuse medical treatment, but physicians often question the patients' ability to make a responsible decision in a time of medical need. Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(2):37-39. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.2.ccas1-0302. Case and Commentary May 2004 Duty to Treat versus Personal Safety, Commentary 1 Mark T. Hughes, MD, MA Physicians have an ethical responsibility to treat patients even at the risk of their own personal safety. Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(5):201-203. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.5.ccas1-0405. Case and Commentary May 2004 Duty to Treat versus Personal Safety, Commentary 2 David Marcozzi, MD Physicians have an ethical responsibility to treat patients even at the risk of their own personal safety. Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(5):203-205. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.5.ccas1-0405. Pagination First page « First Previous page ‹ Previous … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Current page 14
Health Law May 2007 Duty to Treat: Conscience and Pluralism Kayhan Parsi, JD, PhD Physicians have a right to conscientiously object to procedures and therapies that they find to be morally objectionable. Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(5):362-364. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.5.hlaw1-0705.
Medicine and Society May 2006 Obligation To Provide Services: A Physician-Public Defender Comparison June M. McKoy, MD, MPH, JD A physician attorney argues that the best way to ensure that physicians don't refuse to treat patients is to create a system in which their medical education is fully funded and they must repay a debt to society. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):332-334. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.msoc1-0605.
Medicine and Society May 2006 Professional Demands and Religious Observance Mahendr S. Kochar, MD Physicians should not allow their religious beliefs to influence their clinical judgment or the time they spend with patients. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):335-336. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.msoc2-0605.
Case and Commentary Feb 2003 Does Patient Autonomy Outweigh Duty to Treat? Catherine A. Marco, MD Patients can refuse medical treatment, but physicians often question the patients' ability to make a responsible decision in a time of medical need. Virtual Mentor. 2003;5(2):37-39. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.2.ccas1-0302.
Case and Commentary May 2004 Duty to Treat versus Personal Safety, Commentary 1 Mark T. Hughes, MD, MA Physicians have an ethical responsibility to treat patients even at the risk of their own personal safety. Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(5):201-203. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.5.ccas1-0405.
Case and Commentary May 2004 Duty to Treat versus Personal Safety, Commentary 2 David Marcozzi, MD Physicians have an ethical responsibility to treat patients even at the risk of their own personal safety. Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(5):203-205. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.5.ccas1-0405.