Overturning this case’s precedent might result in clinicians claiming more religious exemptions and increased risk of harm to patients.

Lack of ethical, legal, and clinical consensus about best practice sometimes combines with a poor clinical evidence base.

Carefully distinguishing between when the Nazi analogy is aptly applied and when it is not is key to ongoing PAD legalization deliberations.

Dr Jake Greenblum joins Ethics Talk to discuss his article, coauthored with Dr Ryan Hubbard: “Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?”

Police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and parole boards look to reform work with patients.

Dr Frederic G. Reamer joins Ethics Talk to discuss his article: “Why Care-Based, Not Carceral, Approaches to Suspects With Mental Illness Is Key to Whether We Trust Professional or State Authority Ever Again”

Information different patients need or want about cybersecurity risk varies, so communicating clearly is always key.

A history of device oversight by the US Food and Drug Administration traces regulatory changes in response to injuries caused by Dalkon Shield intrauterine devices.

Involuntary commitment is often traumatic and can fracture already fragile relationships persons experiencing homeless have.

Once focused on hospital liability, risk managers now navigate a broader set of enterprise risk management responsibilities.