Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604. Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Prenatal Risk Assessment and Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Strategies for Communicating Well with Patients Eva Schwartz, MD and Kishore Vellody, MD Physicians should provide women considering abortion after Down syndrome screening with unbiased information and not attempt to influence their decision. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):359-364. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas1-1604. Case and Commentary Sep 2002 An Impaired Resident, Commentary 1 Erin Egan, MD, JD Virtual Mentor. 2002;4(9):256-259. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2002.4.9.ccas1-0209. Case and Commentary Sep 2002 An Impaired Resident, Commentary 2 DeWitt C. Baldwin, Jr, MD Virtual Mentor. 2002;4(9):260-263. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2002.4.9.ccas1-0209. Case and Commentary Apr 2005 A Case of Student Cheating, Commentary 1 Veronica Catanese, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):270-273. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas1-0504. Case and Commentary Apr 2005 A Case of Student Cheating, Commentary 2 Paul Aronson Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):273-274. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas1-0504. Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Drinks During Lunch Jahan Fahimi Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):275-278. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas2-0504. Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Resident Work Hour Restrictions, Commentary 1 Mitchell Charap, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):279-281. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas3-0504. Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Resident Work Hour Restrictions, Commentary 2 Deirdre Masterton, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):281-283. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas3-0504. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 1 Stephen Corey, MD and Peter Bulova, MD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):373-378. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Is Proxy Consent for an Invasive Procedure on a Patient with Intellectual Disabilities Ethically Sufficient? Commentary 2 Sonya Charles, PhD Women with intellectual disabilities should not be sedated for a pap smear without their assent, and the test’s risks and benefits should be weighed. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):379-383. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas3-1604.
Case and Commentary Apr 2016 Prenatal Risk Assessment and Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Strategies for Communicating Well with Patients Eva Schwartz, MD and Kishore Vellody, MD Physicians should provide women considering abortion after Down syndrome screening with unbiased information and not attempt to influence their decision. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):359-364. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.ecas1-1604.
Case and Commentary Sep 2002 An Impaired Resident, Commentary 1 Erin Egan, MD, JD Virtual Mentor. 2002;4(9):256-259. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2002.4.9.ccas1-0209.
Case and Commentary Sep 2002 An Impaired Resident, Commentary 2 DeWitt C. Baldwin, Jr, MD Virtual Mentor. 2002;4(9):260-263. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2002.4.9.ccas1-0209.
Case and Commentary Apr 2005 A Case of Student Cheating, Commentary 1 Veronica Catanese, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):270-273. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas1-0504.
Case and Commentary Apr 2005 A Case of Student Cheating, Commentary 2 Paul Aronson Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):273-274. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas1-0504.
Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Drinks During Lunch Jahan Fahimi Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):275-278. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas2-0504.
Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Resident Work Hour Restrictions, Commentary 1 Mitchell Charap, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):279-281. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas3-0504.
Case and Commentary Apr 2005 Resident Work Hour Restrictions, Commentary 2 Deirdre Masterton, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(4):281-283. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.4.ccas3-0504.