Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Letter to the Editor Oct 2019 Response to “Will We Code for Default ECMO?”: Clarifying the Scope of Do-Not-ECMO Orders Jacob A. Blythe, MA, Sarah E. Wieten, PhD, and Jason N. Batten, MD, MA The authors further consider the merits of preventing ECMO from becoming a default treatment. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(10):E926-929. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.926. Letter to the Editor Jul 2020 Response to “How Should Global Tobacco Control Efforts Be Prioritized to Protect Children in Resource-Poor Regions?” A Deliberate Public Policy Plus Naivety at Best Alain Braillon, MD, PhD Do the WHO and health professionals simply fail to do their job adequately? AMA J Ethics. 2020; 22(7):E639-642. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.639. Letter to the Editor Jul 2020 Response to “A Deliberate Public Policy Plus Naivety at Best” Stella Aguinaga Bialous, DrPH and Yvette van der Eijk, PhD Debate continues on how to frame tobacco and nicotine product regulation from a children’s rights perspective. AMA J Ethics. 2020; 22(7):E643-644. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.643. Letter to the Editor Jan 2023 Response to “What Should Clinicians and Patients Know About the Clinical Gaze, Disability, and Iatrogenic Harm When Making Decisions?” Novel Reasons for Diversification of Health Care Vishruth M. Nagam Clinical needs of patients with disabilities are seen with the “medical gaze,” a depersonalized lens of evidence-based medicine and of presumed objectivity. AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(1):E85-87. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.85. Letter to the Editor Jun 2023 Response to “Science and Ethics of ‘Curing’ Misinformation” Jamaji C. Nwanaji-Enwerem, MD, PhD, MPP Trust is a social condition that positions science to beneficially contribute to democratic societies. AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(6):E458-460. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.458.
Letter to the Editor Oct 2019 Response to “Will We Code for Default ECMO?”: Clarifying the Scope of Do-Not-ECMO Orders Jacob A. Blythe, MA, Sarah E. Wieten, PhD, and Jason N. Batten, MD, MA The authors further consider the merits of preventing ECMO from becoming a default treatment. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(10):E926-929. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.926.
Letter to the Editor Jul 2020 Response to “How Should Global Tobacco Control Efforts Be Prioritized to Protect Children in Resource-Poor Regions?” A Deliberate Public Policy Plus Naivety at Best Alain Braillon, MD, PhD Do the WHO and health professionals simply fail to do their job adequately? AMA J Ethics. 2020; 22(7):E639-642. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.639.
Letter to the Editor Jul 2020 Response to “A Deliberate Public Policy Plus Naivety at Best” Stella Aguinaga Bialous, DrPH and Yvette van der Eijk, PhD Debate continues on how to frame tobacco and nicotine product regulation from a children’s rights perspective. AMA J Ethics. 2020; 22(7):E643-644. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.643.
Letter to the Editor Jan 2023 Response to “What Should Clinicians and Patients Know About the Clinical Gaze, Disability, and Iatrogenic Harm When Making Decisions?” Novel Reasons for Diversification of Health Care Vishruth M. Nagam Clinical needs of patients with disabilities are seen with the “medical gaze,” a depersonalized lens of evidence-based medicine and of presumed objectivity. AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(1):E85-87. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.85.
Letter to the Editor Jun 2023 Response to “Science and Ethics of ‘Curing’ Misinformation” Jamaji C. Nwanaji-Enwerem, MD, PhD, MPP Trust is a social condition that positions science to beneficially contribute to democratic societies. AMA J Ethics. 2023; 25(6):E458-460. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.458.