Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Case and Commentary May 2019 Should Physicians Offer a Ventricular Assist Device to a Pediatric Oncology Patient With a Poor Prognosis? Angira Patel, MD, MPH, Anna Joong, MD, Efrat Lelkes, MD, and Jeffrey G. Gossett, MD When evaluating a 10-year-old with leukemia and chemo-induced heart failure for VAD placement, a team considers what to do. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E380-386. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.380. Case and Commentary May 2019 Should Long-Term Life-Sustaining Care Be Started in Emergency Settings? Ellen C. Meltzer, MD, MSc, Natalia S. Ivascu, MD, Mark K. Edwin, MD, and Timothy J. Ingall, MBBS, MD, PhD Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines emphasize proportionality and benefit/risk analyses in decision making. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E401-406. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.401. Case and Commentary May 2019 How Should Physicians Respond to Requests for LVAD Removal? Larry A. Allen, MD, MHS Patients have a right to decline or withdraw LVADs. Informed consent and shared decision making is not easy, however, with treatments that are high risk, high reward. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E394-400. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.394. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Option Comparison Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6b-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Additional Information Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6c-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Option Assessment Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6a-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respect for Patient Decision Making: Mr. Douglas's Choice of Treatment Jeanne Sokolec, EdD, MSW Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):23-27. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas5-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Disclosure and Patient Information: Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6-0501. Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Surrogate Decision Making: Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7-0501. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Next page Next › Last page Last »
Case and Commentary May 2019 Should Physicians Offer a Ventricular Assist Device to a Pediatric Oncology Patient With a Poor Prognosis? Angira Patel, MD, MPH, Anna Joong, MD, Efrat Lelkes, MD, and Jeffrey G. Gossett, MD When evaluating a 10-year-old with leukemia and chemo-induced heart failure for VAD placement, a team considers what to do. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E380-386. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.380.
Case and Commentary May 2019 Should Long-Term Life-Sustaining Care Be Started in Emergency Settings? Ellen C. Meltzer, MD, MSc, Natalia S. Ivascu, MD, Mark K. Edwin, MD, and Timothy J. Ingall, MBBS, MD, PhD Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines emphasize proportionality and benefit/risk analyses in decision making. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E401-406. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.401.
Case and Commentary May 2019 How Should Physicians Respond to Requests for LVAD Removal? Larry A. Allen, MD, MHS Patients have a right to decline or withdraw LVADs. Informed consent and shared decision making is not easy, however, with treatments that are high risk, high reward. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E394-400. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.394.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband, Option Comparison Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):-. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7c-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Option Comparison Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6b-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Additional Information Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6c-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look, Option Assessment Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6a-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Respect for Patient Decision Making: Mr. Douglas's Choice of Treatment Jeanne Sokolec, EdD, MSW Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):23-27. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas5-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Disclosure and Patient Information: Mr. Douglas's Angiogram Gets a Second Look Faith Lagay, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas6-0501.
Case and Commentary Jan 2005 Surrogate Decision Making: Mrs. Douglas's Choice of Treatment for Her Husband Jennifer Reenan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.1.ccas7-0501.