Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent Letter to the Editor Oct 2017 Response to “What Should Physicians Do When They Disagree, Clinically and Ethically, with a Surrogate’s Wishes?” Petros Ioannou, MD, MSc, PhD Understanding the religious background of patients and their surrogates is essential to providing patient-centered care at the end of life. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(10):1051-1053. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.corr3-1710. Medicine and Society Oct 2019 How Should Decision Aids Be Used During Counseling to Help Patients Who Are “Genetically at Risk”? Natalie Evans, PhD, Suzanne Metselaar, PhD, Carla van El, PhD, Nina Hallowell, DPhil, MA, and Guy Widdershoven, PhD Prognostic uncertainty about risk creates demand for ongoing communication and facilitated reflection about goals and values. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(10):E865-872. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.865. Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352. Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358. State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604. Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145. Health Law May 2022 Does Regulating Dietary Supplements as Food in a World of Social Media Influencers Promote Public Safety? Joshua J. Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary supplements can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(5):E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396. Case and Commentary Jun 2022 How Should Health Systems Help Clinicians Manage Bias Against Ex-combatants? Christopher W. Reynolds and Camilo Sánchez Meertens, MPP Clinicians in postconflict health care settings can be tasked with caring for patients who were enemies. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E483-488. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.483. Health Law Jun 2022 Survivor-Centered Approaches to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Klearchos A. Kyriakides, PhD, MPhil and Andreas K. Demetriades, MBBChir, MPhil During or after conflict, a clinician might be required to provide evidence to an official investigatory body or court. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E495-517. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.495. Health Law May 2022 ¿La regulación de suplementos dietéticos como alimentos promueve la seguridad pública en un mundo de influentes en redes sociales? Joshua Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Next page Next › Last page Last »
Letter to the Editor Oct 2017 Response to “What Should Physicians Do When They Disagree, Clinically and Ethically, with a Surrogate’s Wishes?” Petros Ioannou, MD, MSc, PhD Understanding the religious background of patients and their surrogates is essential to providing patient-centered care at the end of life. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(10):1051-1053. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.corr3-1710.
Medicine and Society Oct 2019 How Should Decision Aids Be Used During Counseling to Help Patients Who Are “Genetically at Risk”? Natalie Evans, PhD, Suzanne Metselaar, PhD, Carla van El, PhD, Nina Hallowell, DPhil, MA, and Guy Widdershoven, PhD Prognostic uncertainty about risk creates demand for ongoing communication and facilitated reflection about goals and values. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(10):E865-872. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.865.
Case and Commentary May 2020 When a Patient Regrets Having Undergone a Carefully and Jointly Considered Treatment Plan, How Should Her Physician Respond? Luke V. Selby, MD, MS, Christopher T. Aquina, MD, MPH, and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS Whether a patient’s decisional regret constitutes a failure of shared decision making can depend on how a decision was made. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E352-357. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.352.
Case and Commentary May 2020 Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity Tim Lahey, MD, MMSc and Glyn Elwyn, MD, PhD, MSc Shared decision making honors patient autonomy, particularly for preference-sensitive care decisions and even when patients have impaired decision-making capacity. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):E358-364. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.358.
State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604.
Policy Forum Feb 2022 Por qué los enfoques no carcelarios basados en la atención para las personas detenidas con enfermedades mentales son clave para volver a confiar o no en los profesionales o la autoridad estatal Frederic G. Reamer, PhD AMA J Ethics. 2022;E145-149. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.145.
Health Law May 2022 Does Regulating Dietary Supplements as Food in a World of Social Media Influencers Promote Public Safety? Joshua J. Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary supplements can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(5):E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396.
Case and Commentary Jun 2022 How Should Health Systems Help Clinicians Manage Bias Against Ex-combatants? Christopher W. Reynolds and Camilo Sánchez Meertens, MPP Clinicians in postconflict health care settings can be tasked with caring for patients who were enemies. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E483-488. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.483.
Health Law Jun 2022 Survivor-Centered Approaches to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Klearchos A. Kyriakides, PhD, MPhil and Andreas K. Demetriades, MBBChir, MPhil During or after conflict, a clinician might be required to provide evidence to an official investigatory body or court. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(6):E495-517. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.495.
Health Law May 2022 ¿La regulación de suplementos dietéticos como alimentos promueve la seguridad pública en un mundo de influentes en redes sociales? Joshua Klein and Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE Weaknesses in regulatory approaches to negligent misrepresentation claims about dietary can have clinical and public health consequences. AMA J Ethics. 2022;E396-401. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.396.