Search Results Search Sort by RelevanceMost Recent State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604. Personal Narrative Feb 2023 How Should We Respond When Clinicians’ Calls to CPS Are Punitively Weaponized Against Families? Arielle Schecter, MD This narrative illuminates need for students and clinicians to be well prepared to face ethically and structurally complex realities of identifying and responding to children. AMA J Ethics. 2023;25(2):E159-165. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.159. Policy Forum Mar 2005 Health Care for Incarcerated Adolescents: Significant Needs with Considerable Obstacles Robert E. Morris, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(3):244-248. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.3.pfor2-0503. Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 1 Patrick D. Guinan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505. Health Law May 2006 Legal Protection for Conscientious Objection by Health Professionals Allison Grady Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):327-331. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.hlaw1-0605. Viewpoint May 2006 The Growing Abuse of Conscientious Objection Rebecca J. Cook, JD, JSD and Bernard M. Dickens, LLB, LLM, PhD, LLD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):337-340. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.oped1-0605. Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Quality of Life and Prenatal Decisions, Commentary 1 Ludger Schols, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):136-140. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas1-0502. Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Quality of Life and Prenatal Decisions, Commentary 2 Georg Marckmann, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):136-140. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas1-0502. Viewpoint Jan 2006 Is Prenatal Genetic Screening Unjustly Discriminatory? Jeff McMahan, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):50-52. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped1-0601. Viewpoint Jan 2006 The Uncertain Rationale for Prenatal Disability Screening David Wasserman, JD and Adrienne Asch, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53-56. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped2-0601. Pagination Current page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Next page Next › Last page Last »
State of the Art and Science Apr 2016 Keeping the Backdoor to Eugenics Ajar?: Disability and the Future of Prenatal Screening Gareth M. Thomas, PhD and Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD Noninvasive prenatal testing arguably constitutes a form of eugenics in a social context in which certain reproductive outcomes are not valued. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(4):406-415. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.4.stas1-1604.
Personal Narrative Feb 2023 How Should We Respond When Clinicians’ Calls to CPS Are Punitively Weaponized Against Families? Arielle Schecter, MD This narrative illuminates need for students and clinicians to be well prepared to face ethically and structurally complex realities of identifying and responding to children. AMA J Ethics. 2023;25(2):E159-165. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.159.
Policy Forum Mar 2005 Health Care for Incarcerated Adolescents: Significant Needs with Considerable Obstacles Robert E. Morris, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(3):244-248. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.3.pfor2-0503.
Case and Commentary May 2005 Patau Syndrome and Perinatal Decision Making, Commentary 1 Patrick D. Guinan, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(5):336-341. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.ccas1-0505.
Health Law May 2006 Legal Protection for Conscientious Objection by Health Professionals Allison Grady Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):327-331. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.hlaw1-0605.
Viewpoint May 2006 The Growing Abuse of Conscientious Objection Rebecca J. Cook, JD, JSD and Bernard M. Dickens, LLB, LLM, PhD, LLD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(5):337-340. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.5.oped1-0605.
Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Quality of Life and Prenatal Decisions, Commentary 1 Ludger Schols, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):136-140. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas1-0502.
Case and Commentary Feb 2005 Quality of Life and Prenatal Decisions, Commentary 2 Georg Marckmann, MD Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(2):136-140. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.2.ccas1-0502.
Viewpoint Jan 2006 Is Prenatal Genetic Screening Unjustly Discriminatory? Jeff McMahan, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):50-52. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped1-0601.
Viewpoint Jan 2006 The Uncertain Rationale for Prenatal Disability Screening David Wasserman, JD and Adrienne Asch, PhD Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53-56. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.1.oped2-0601.