Skip to main content
AMA Journal of Ethics®
Illuminating the Art of Medicine

Main navigation

  • Issues
  • Articles
  • Cases
  • Art
  • Multimedia
  • CME
  • Topics
  • For Authors
  • Call for Papers
  • Call for Artwork
  • Call for Editorial Fellows
  • Art Collaborations
  • Register for Sep 10 Grand Rounds
  • En Español

Featured Content

Case and Commentary
Apr 2025

¿Cómo deberían proteger los miembros del equipo de cirugía a los pacientes que están privados de libertad de la vigilancia o intrusión de los oficiales del centro penitenciario?

Anna Lin, MD and Mallory Williams, MD, MPH
Case and Commentary
Feb 2025

¿Cómo se debe describir y tratar el dolor causado por la colocación del DIU?

Veronica Hutchison, MD and Eve Espey, MD, MPH

Articles

Article Types
Topics
Core Competencies
Specialties
Language
Reset
  • image
    Case and Commentary
    Dec 2015

    The Question of Clinical Equipoise and Patients’ Best Interests

    Spencer Phillips Hey, PhD and Robert D. Truog, MD
    Clinical equipoise—the idea that the community of medical experts is uncertain about the relative therapeutic merits of the arms of a clinical trial at its outset—mitigates physicians’ responsibility for patients’ poor outcomes when patients are assigned to the control arm or are harmed by an investigational agent.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1108-1115. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas1-1512.
  • image
    Case and Commentary
    Dec 2015

    Enrolling Research Participants in Private Practice: Conflicts of Interest, Consistency, Therapeutic Misconception, and Informed Consent

    Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, MD, PhD and Kristin Stanley Bramlage, MD
    Advice for enrolling patients in clinical trials.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1122-1126. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas3-1512.
  • image
    Health Law
    Dec 2015

    New Developments in Human Subjects Protections: Proposed Updates to the Common Rule

    Richard Weinmeyer, JD, MA, MPhil
    The 2015 proposed changes to the Common Rule for human subjects research protections, which are a response to novel methods of data collection and analysis, clarify and broaden the scope of informed consent processes, identify exemptions, and make changes to Institutional Review Board requirements.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1147-1151. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.hlaw1-1512.
  • image
    History of Medicine
    Dec 2015

    Dying for Science: Historical Perspectives on Research Participants’ Deaths

    Susan E. Lederer, PhD
    The continuance of public and institutional support for medical research after the publicized deaths of human research participants in the 1950s contrasts sharply with the disciplining of institutions responsible for two such deaths in recent decades, which suggests that medical research participants are no longer receiving public recognition for their contributions to science.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1166-1171. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.mhst1-1512.
  • image
    AMA Code Says
    Dec 2015

    AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ Opinions on Clinical Research

    AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs
    The AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ opinions on clinical investigation, subject selection for clinical trials, including members from vulnerable groups, and managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1136-1141. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.coet1-1512.
  • image
    Medical Education
    Dec 2015

    The National Clinician Scholars Program: Teaching Transformational Leadership and Promoting Health Justice through Community-Engaged Research Ethics

    Elizabeth Bromley, MD, PhD, Loretta Jones, MA, ThD, Marjorie S. Rosenthal, MD, MPH, Michele Heisler, MD, MPA, Julie A. Sochalski, PhD, RN, Deborah Koniak-Griffin, RNC, EdD, Cristina Punzalan, MPH, and Kenneth B. Wells, MD, MPH
    The National Clinician Scholars Program, which will begin training physician and nursing scholars in partnership with local community-based agencies in 2016, aims to develop health care leaders who pursue community-centered goals and treat their community partners with equality and respect.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1127-1135. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.medu1-1512.
  • undue influence
    Case and Commentary
    Dec 2015

    When Does the Amount We Pay Research Participants Become “Undue Influence”?

    Erin P. Williams, MBE and Jennifer K. Walter, MD, PhD, MS
    Undue influence, which occurs when prospective research participants who otherwise would not enroll are induced to enter studies that might pose significant risks, may also involve social injustices such as unequal payment and participant selection methods that unequally distribute the potential harms and benefits of research.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(12):1116-1121. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas2-1512.
  • grow a spine and have a heart
    Case and Commentary
    Nov 2015

    Grow a Spine, Have a Heart: Responding to Patient Requests for Marginally Beneficial Care

    Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, MD, Annika Beck, and Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH
    Good clinicians understand why a patient is asking for a test or treatment, and their skillful counseling can often stem the tide of requests for marginally beneficial tests and procedures.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(11):1028-1034. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.11.ecas2-1511.
  • high value care
    From the Editor
    Nov 2015

    The Era of High-Value Care

    Sri Lekha Tummalapalli, MD, MBA
    A new ethos for practicing medicine emphasizes reducing medical errors, minimizing waste, containing costs, and improving adherence to quality metrics.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(11):1019-1021. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.11.fred1-1511.
  • sustainable growth
    Policy Forum
    Nov 2015

    Repeal of the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate: Direct and Indirect Consequences

    Jeffrey Clemens, PhD and Stan Veuger, PhD
    The Sustainable Growth Rate was replaced in 2015 by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, which introduced fixed annual physician fee updates and a merit-based incentive payment system.
    AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(11):1053-1058. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.11.pfor1-1511.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Prev
  • …
  • Page 149
  • Page 150
  • Page 151
  • Page 152
  • Current page 153
  • Page 154
  • Page 155
  • Page 156
  • Page 157
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
AMA Journal of Ethics®
Illuminating the Art of Medicine

Footer menu

  • About
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact
American Medical Association

Email Signup


We do not share email addresses and will only use yours to send new content alerts. (Add [email protected] to your contacts to help ensure receipt.)
Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2376-6980