Artist and researcher Dr Mark Gilbert joins Ethics Talk to discuss arts-based research: what it is, who it’s for, and why we should pay closer attention to it as a method of clinical inquiry.

Dr David DeGrazia joins Ethics Talk to discuss why the “3 R’s” of nonhuman animal research might not be sufficient to promote good science, ethics, and nonhuman animal welfare.

The World Health Organization and American Academy of Pediatrics recommend disclosing serostatus to sexually active adolescents. What else can be done to improve clinical outcomes and promote public health?

Historically, most discussions about nonhuman animal experimentation consider what has become known as the 3 R’s: refinement, reduction, and replacement.

Humans make critical decisions about nonhuman lab animals outside the lab: during breeding, transportation, and end-of-study protocols.

How to amend the 3 R’s has been driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement.

Ethically justifying human-centered research with only nonhuman animals as subjects likely requires that the research’s benefits to humans must, at least, outweigh harms suffered by the nonhuman animals.

Clinicians should know how randomized controlled trials can and cannot contribute to advancing health equity for transgender and gender diverse people.

This study offers an arts-based tool set capable of being delivered within the familiar medical education setting and established structure of the OSCE.

This study has implications for designing arts-based wellness activities for clinicians and scaling them nationwide.